ACTRN12611000233921
Not yet recruiting
未知
High-flow nasal cannulae versus ambient oxygen for the treatment of newborn infants with early respiratory distress in non-tertiary special care nurseries – A multicentre randomised controlled trial
niversity of Newcastle0 sites520 target enrollmentMarch 3, 2011
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Respiratory distress
- Sponsor
- niversity of Newcastle
- Enrollment
- 520
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Diagnosed with respiratory distress. Defined as at least one of the following: intercostal/subcostal recession, audible ‘grunt’, or tachypnoea (respiratory rate \>60/min).
- •2\. Who require any supplemental inspired oxygen to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (Sp02\) of 90\-95% for a period of more than one hour.
- •3\. Aged less than 24 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Gestational age at birth less than 32 completed weeks. The trial will continue to support and encourage the NHMRC recommendations for in utero transfer of infants expected to be born at less than 33weeks gestation. Furthermore, no change in practice will be made for those centres that routinely transfer in utero at gestational ages higher than 33 weeks. It is not uncommon, however, for babies of this gestation to be unavoidably born at a non\-tertiary nursery.
- •2\. Birth weight lower than that which the SCN would normally care for.
- •3\. Apgar score less than or equal to 3 at 5 minutes of age (used as an arbitrary and de\-facto indicator of possible perinatal asphyxia).
- •4\. Any infant who is perceived by their paediatrician to need NICU care, or who has a known major congenital abnormality requiring care in a tertiary centre, or which may impact upon the infant’s condition after birth (eg. congenital cardiac disease, upper airway obstruction, gastrointestinal malformations).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the effects on blood oxygen level between two delivery of oxygen methods during long endoscopic proceduresACTRN12620000931976Austin Health300
Recruiting
Not Applicable
High-flow nasal cannula versus standard oxygen therapy assisting sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in high risk cases: A randomised multicentre trialAnaesthesiaendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyAirway managementOral and Gastrointestinal - Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colonRespiratory - Normal development and function of the respiratory systemAnaesthesiology - AnaestheticsACTRN12619000397112The Queen Elizabeth Hopsital Anaesthesia Department132
Completed
Phase 4
High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children with respiratory distressInfants and children with respiratory distressHFNC,Conventional oxygen therapy,respiratory distressTCTR20170222007Rachada Pisek Sompotch177
Completed
Not Applicable
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in emergency roomPatients presenting with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in an emergency roomDyspneaHypoxemiaEmergency roomOxygen therapyTCTR20140618002Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital40
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing oxygenation between two techniques in patients, after extubation from general anaesthesia 1.High flow nasal cannula 2.venturi maskCTRI/2020/07/026482ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital