Development and Pilot Testing of an Equity-focused and Trauma-informed Communication Intervention During Family-centered Rounds
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Hospitalism in Children
- Sponsor
- Duke University
- Enrollment
- 90
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Feasibility measured by enrollment rate of clinicians and caregivers combined
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Development and pilot testing of a clinician coaching communication intervention to improve communication between medical teams and caregivers (parents, family members) of children in the hospital. Our team is specifically focused on improving partnership, respect, and collaboration with Black and Latinx caregivers of children in the hospital by incorporating elements from trauma-informed care and racial equity into a communication intervention. The investigators will explore the impact of this intervention on communication quality, caregiver trust, caregiver satisfaction, and hospital readmissions.
Detailed Description
When admitted to the hospital, Black and Latino(a/x) children are at greater risk of medical errors, surgical complications, longer, more-costly hospital stays, and mortality compared to White children. Although many factors play a role, poor clinician communication likely contributes to these disparities in health outcomes. Across settings, including our preliminary work in the inpatient pediatric environment, Black and Latino(a/x) patients have been shown to experience worse communication quality as evidenced by less patient and family-centered, empathic, and respectful communication as compared to White patients. Poor communication can make the hospital stay more stressful for caregivers, with implications for caregiver and child health and recovery from illness. While prior experiences of discrimination and trauma can negatively affect clinician-caregiver communication, current best practices in clinician communication fail to incorporate equity and trauma-informed principles. In this study the investigators will test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a pilot randomized waitlist control trial of an equity focused and trauma-informed clinician coaching communication intervention that aims to teach clinicians skills to improve communication in areas where inequities are known to exist (i.e. respect, partnership) and incorporate principles of equity (i.e affirmation) and trauma-informed care. To do this, first the investigators will co-develop and refine a clinician coaching communication intervention with iterative feedback from Black and Latino(a/x) caregivers as well as clinicians of children in the hospital. Second, the investigators will examine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the intervention. The investigators will randomize 10 clinicians to an intervention or waitlist group; clinicians in the intervention group will receive the intervention immediately, while clinicians in the waitlist group will initially serve as the control arm then receive the intervention to provide feasibility and acceptability data. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruiting and collecting data as well as acceptability of the intervention by clinicians. The investigators will explore preliminary efficacy for the effect of the intervention on communication, caregiver satisfaction, caregiver trust, and hospital readmissions.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Feasibility measured by enrollment rate of clinicians and caregivers combined
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Feasibility measured by the rate of complete data collection by caregivers
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Fidelity measured by the rate of intervention elements completed per encounter by clinicians
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Acceptability of the intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The AIM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.
Appropriateness measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The IAM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.
Feasibility measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The FIM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.
Number of Clinician rapport-building statements
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinician communication behaviors measured via audio-recorded hospital encounters.
Number of Clinician partnership-building statements
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinician communication behaviors measured via audio-recorded hospital encounters.
Number of Clinician interruptions
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinician communication behaviors measured via audio-recorded hospital encounters.
Number of Clinician praise statements
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinician communication behaviors measured via audio-recorded hospital encounters.
Number of Clinician permission asking
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinician communication behaviors measured via audio-recorded hospital encounters.
Caregiver Satisfaction measured by survey
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
1 item question on the post-rounds caregiver survey. Response choices will include: not at all satisfied, a little satisfied, satisfied, and extremely satisfied.
Caregiver Trust in their Childs Doctors measured by the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale is a validated 5 item instrument on the post-rounds caregiver survey. Responses to the 5 items are summed together and can vary from a score of 5-25. A higher score indicates a more positive outcome.
Caregiver Reported Communication Quality measured by the Interpersonal Processes of Care Short Form
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The interpersonal processes of care measure has 18 items on the short form, each with response of Never (score=1), Rarely (Score=2), Sometimes (Score=3), Usually (Score=4), Always(Score=5). The Investigator will average together responses from the 18 items to give a value from 1-5 for each domain.
Caregiver Stress
Time Frame: Timeframe up to 12 months
Measured by salivary cortisol levels
Secondary Outcomes
- Number of Caregiver Participatory Behaviors(Up to 12 months)
- Number of participants with Hospital Readmission at 30 days(30 days after discharge)
- Number of participants with Hospital Readmission at 90 days(90 days after discharge)
- Caregiver ability to correctly identify child's diagnosis(Up to 12 months)
- Change in caregiver Salivary Cortisol(30-60 minutes before and 20-30 minutes after FCR)