Communication Coaching to Improve Patient and Clinician Satisfaction in Cardiology Encounters

Not Applicable

Completed

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of a clinician communication coaching intervention versus control on an objective measure of the quality of communication (primary outcome) and patients' perceptions of the quality of patient-centered care (secondary outcome), both overall and within Black and White patients.

Detailed Description: The investigators propose a two-arm cluster randomized controlled design, in which the unit of randomization is the clinician. Up to fifty cardiology clinicians will be randomly assigned to either the coaching intervention or to a control condition. The investigators will recruit up to 50 clinicians to ensure that we have at least 40 clinicians with complete pre- and post-intervention measures. Although the unit of randomization is the clinician, the unit of evaluation is the patient: 10 patients per clinician who get cardiology care from the enrolled clinicians will consent to audio-recording of their encounters and to completing the surveys. Clinicians randomized to the intervention will obtain verbal consent from additional patients to audio-record the encounter for coaching. The intervention will be delivered in the clinic or via video-conference (Skype or Facetime), providing individual coaching and professional feedback on the communication behaviors encounters. The investigators will also measure Press Ganey scores by clinician pre- and post-intervention.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Communication Intervention	Communication Intervention	The intervention will contain elements of Motivational Interviewing coaching but also will teach providers how to address patient emotion and increase the efficiency of their visits. Clinicians randomized to the intervention will receive a tailored communication coaching intervention that includes didactic elements, audio recording encounters and providing feedback, and role-playing.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Cardiologist Behavior as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment.	One encounter, up to approximately 1 hour	WISER is based on established codebooks (i.e., Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity manual, and Suchman's codebook for patient emotion and physician empathic responses). Communication coaches taught five skills: 1) sitting down and making eye contact with all in the room, 2) open-ended questions, 3) reflective statements, 4) empathic statements, and 5) "What questions do you have?". Reported here is the number of Open-ended Questions asked.
Ratio of Empathic Responses to Empathic Opportunities	One encounter, up to approximately 1 hour	Communication coaches taught five skills: 1) sitting down and making eye contact with all in the room, 2) open-ended questions, 3) reflective statements, 4) empathic statements, and 5) "What questions do you have?". Reported here is the ratio of empathic responses to empathic opportunities.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Global Ratings of Communication as Measured by WISER (Writing, Immersive Experiences, Speaking, Ethical Communication, and Research) Assessment	One encounter, up to approximately 1 hour	Global ratings represent areas of effective communication that address many domains of patient-centered communication or areas that facilitate patient satisfaction with communication. WISER is based on established codebooks (i.e., Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity manual, and Suchman's codebook for patient emotion and physician empathic responses. Scores of 1-5 with 3 being average, 1 being below average, 5 being above average.

Locations (2): Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center - Cancer Prevention, Detection and Control
🇺🇸
Durham, North Carolina, United States