Comparison of complete and incomplete occlusion methods in amblyopia
Phase 3
Recruiting
- Conditions
- amblyopia
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000040639
- Lead Sponsor
- Kitasato university hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1. Those with eye movement restriction (abduction restriction) 2. Cranial MRI or CT reveals intracranial disease or intraorbital disease 3. Those who have already been diagnosed at another hospital and have already started treatment 4. What the researcher deems inappropriate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method visual acuity improvement period
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual acuity refraction value Accommodating paralysis refraction value Eye position Stereoacuity
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying complete versus incomplete occlusion in amblyopia treatment?
How does the complete occlusion method compare to standard-of-care treatments for functional amblyopia?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to occlusion therapy in amblyopia patients?
What adverse events are associated with complete and incomplete occlusion methods in amblyopia trials?
What combination approaches or alternative therapies are being explored alongside occlusion methods for amblyopia?