COMPARISON of VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY and MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPY in PEDIATRIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY

University of Gaziantep1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentApril 1, 2022

ConditionsPediatric Patients Undergoing Operation

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Pediatric Patients Undergoing Operation
Sponsor: University of Gaziantep
Enrollment: 100
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: Mean intubation time
Status: Completed
Last Updated: last year

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

In this study, we aimed to observe the intubation conditions in patients using Endolarenx video laryngoscope and Macintosh Blade in laryngoscopy to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using video laryngoscopy in pediatric patients.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

April 1, 2022

End Date

August 1, 2022

Last Updated

last year

Study Type

Observational

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

University of Gaziantep

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Elzem SEN

Gaziantep University

University of Gaziantep

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•One hundred pediatric patients, aged under 18 years, weighing between 10-40 kg, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III risk group

Exclusion Criteria

•Patients with congenital airway deformities, patients with known or predicted difficult intubation, patients undergoing emergency surgery, patients classified above ASA III, and patients whose parents did not consent were excluded from the study