Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

Completed

• Conditions: Pediatric Patients Undergoing Operation

• Registration Number: NCT06644586
• Lead Sponsor: University of Gaziantep

Brief Summary

In this study, we aimed to observe the intubation conditions in patients using Endolarenx video laryngoscope and Macintosh Blade in laryngoscopy to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using video laryngoscopy in pediatric patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-04-01
• Primary Completion: 2022-06-01
• Study Completion: 2022-08-01
• Status Verified: 2024-10
• Study First Submitted: 2024-10-14
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-10-14
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-10-14
• Study First Posted: 2024-10-16
• Last Update Posted: 2024-10-16

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• One hundred pediatric patients, aged under 18 years, weighing between 10-40 kg, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II-III risk group

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with congenital airway deformities, patients with known or predicted difficult intubation, patients undergoing emergency surgery, patients classified above ASA III, and patients whose parents did not consent were excluded from the study

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mean intubation time	The time from the entry of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity until the appearance of the EtCO2 trace on the capnograph.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Gaziantep University; 🇹🇷 Gaziantep, Turkey