Imaging Methods Like Dermoscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography, in Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and 3D Total Body Photography for the Diagnosis of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer and Its Precursors
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
- Sponsor
- Technische Universität Dresden
- Enrollment
- 250
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Management of non-melanoma skin cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Prospective, unicentric study that examines if imaging devices like total body photography, dermoscopy, optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy as an addition to clinical examination lead to a benefit for patients in the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer and their precursors
Detailed Description
250 patients with lesions that are suspicious for non-melanoma skin cancer that had not yet had a biopsy, are randomized in 2 groups. The intervention group is examined with total body photography, dermoscopy, optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy; the control group is examined with dermoscopy only. The aim of the study is to investigate whether these methods improve the early detection of non-melanoma skin cancer and their precursors. Examined are not only the differences in management of the lesions (excision, biopsy, local treatment or no treatment) and the diagnostic accuracy of the devices.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with 1 or more lesions suspicious for non-melanoma skin cancer that had not yet had a biopsy or diagnostic excision of the lesions
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with non-melanoma skin cancer that has already been examined with a punch biopsy or diagnostic excision
- •Patients younger than 18 years
- •Patients that are incapable of giving consent
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Management of non-melanoma skin cancer
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Is management of non-melanoma skin cancer optimized after using non-invasive imaging devices like optical coherence tomography, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in comparison to examination with dermoscopy alone (number of primary excisions, number of biopsies, number of secondary inpatient stays due to positive biopsies, number of local treatments and lesions in which no treatment is necessary)
Secondary Outcomes
- Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in comparison to dermoscopy alone for non-melanoma skin cancer(up to 24 months)
- Diagnostic accuracy of 3D total body photography(up to 24 months)
- Diagnostic accuracy of the combination of optical coherence tomography and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in non-melanoma skin cancer(up to 24 months)