Comparing the efficacy of two educational methods concept mapping and WebQuest on nursing students' learning of diabetes disease lesso
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Diabetes mellitus.Diabetes mellitusE10, E11,
- Registration Number
- IRCT201305148505N4
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 72
Inclusion Criteria
obtain medical surgical 3 module; lack of receiving previous training in the field of diabetes; taking IT module.
Exclusion criteria: not participate in the pre-test; absences in a class session of concept mapping; lack of timely delivery assignments of web quest.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Amount of nursing students' learning. Timepoint: Before and two weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Achievement test.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Meaningful learning. Timepoint: Before and two weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: Achievement test.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie diabetes mellitus E10 and E11 subtypes in nursing education contexts?
How does concept mapping compare to WebQuest in teaching diabetes mellitus management to nursing students?
Are there specific biomarkers that correlate with improved learning outcomes in diabetes mellitus education?
What adverse events are associated with concept mapping and WebQuest educational interventions in clinical training?
What combination educational strategies enhance diabetes mellitus learning beyond concept mapping and WebQuest?