Comparison between arch width and inclination of the incisors with Self-ligating & Conventional brackets.
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/09/045206
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Teisovinuo Kesiezie
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
•Class II/ class I malocclusion
•Patients presented with full permanent dentition (excluding third molars)
•Low to moderate crowding (0-5mm)
•Amendable to non-extraction treatment
•Good oral hygiene and periodontal health.
•No history of previous orthodontic treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
•Cleft lip and cleft palate and other craniofacial anomalies
•Patient undergone previous orthodontic treatment
•Patients who need extraction of first premolar in maxillary or mandibular arches.
•Congenital absence of teeth in both maxillary and mandibular arches other than third molars
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method the efficacy of self-ligating system is expected to produce significant changes in transverse arch dimension with minimal incisal inclination and reduced buccal corridors when compared with conventional pre-adjusted bracket.Timepoint: 4 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Group bonded with self-ligating system is expected to show significant changes in transverse arch dimension, minimal incisal inclination and reduced buccal corridorTimepoint: 4 months