MedPath

Comparative Experimental Study Between Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine Regarding Efficacy in Third Molar Removal Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Third Molars Extraction
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT07108465
Lead Sponsor
Henrique Tedesco
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in third molar removal surgery under general anesthesia in healthy volunteers. The main question aims to determine whether there is any difference in vital signs, hemostasis and postoperative pain between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in patients undergoing third molars extraction under general anesthesia.

Researchers will compare bupivacaine and ropivacaine in a split-mouth study to determine if one drug is more effective in third molar extraction surgery under general anesthesia (better hemostasis, less postoperative pain, and fewer changes in vital signs). Participants will undergo a single surgical procedure and complete the Visual Analog Scale to record postoperative pain

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients aged 18 to 60
  • Patients ASA Physical Status Classification I and II
  • Patients with impacted or semi-impacted lower third molars with similar positioning on both sides according to the Pell and Gregory classification
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who can have surgery under local anesthesia
  • Patients where more procedures are required in the same surgical session

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group A - BupivacaineBupivacaine 0,5%use of bupivacaine 0,5% + epinephrine 0,2mL in third molar surgery in general anesthesia
Group B - RopivacaineRopivacaine 0,75%use of ropivacaine 0,75% + epinephrine 0,2mL in third molar surgery in general anesthesia
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluate if there is a significant difference between groups in postoperative analgesic capacity using Visual Analog Scale, intraoperative hemostasis and in vital signs during anesthesia.From surgery to 7 postoperative days

The Visual Analog Scale (0-10 VAS) can be interpreted as no pain (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6),severe (7-9),or worse pain (10)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

🇧🇷

Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
🇧🇷Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Henrique T Oliveira
Contact
55 51999601939
htedesco99@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.