TCTR20201218003
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of anesthetic effectiveness and safety of 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine for mandibular third molar impaction surgery †A randomized control trial study
/A0 sites68 target enrollmentDecember 18, 2020
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Duration of anesthesiaOnset of anesthesiaCardiovascular changeVisual analog scaleParesthesia
- Sponsor
- /A
- Enrollment
- 68
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\.Patients with mesioangular positioned depth B lower third molar impaction
- •2\.Absence of systemic illness(ASA I)
- •3\.Age between 18 to 40 years old
- •4\.Provided written informed consent
- •5\.communicated with Thai language
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\.Patient has any signs of inflammation or infection at the extraction site
- •2\.Pregnancy or current lactation
- •3\.Take any other pain medication prior to the removal of third molar
- •4\.History of allergic reaction of local anesthesia
- •5\.History of bleeding tendency or was given any anticoagulant drugs
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A
Anesthetics efficiency of 1.8 ml: inferior alveolar nerve block with Lidocaine, mental nerve block with Articaine, infiltration with Articaine, in irreversible pulpitis of mandibular caninesIRCT20210515051306N4Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences165
Completed
N/A
To compare the anaesthetic efficiency of intraligamentary injection of 3 different anaesthetic agents.Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glandsCTRI/2021/04/032666DrManan Shroff99
Unknown
Phase 1
Evaluation on post treatment pain in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment with 3 agents Lignocaine,sodium Diclofenac, Ketorolac tromethamine.Health Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2020/09/027635Dr Meghna Kothari198
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesHealth Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati