MedPath

"Using Dilute Vinegar to Find Changes in Cells During Endoscopy for Patients With Barrett's Oesophagus" (The ABBA Study)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Barrett Esophagus
Interventions
Procedure: Non targeted quadrantic biopsies
Registration Number
NCT02407392
Lead Sponsor
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Brief Summary

Problem statement Barrett's oesophagus is a pre-cancerous condition affecting 375,000 people in the U.K. There is a 0.5-3% yearly risk of progressing to oesophageal cancer, from which only 5% of patients will survive for 5 years after diagnosis. Diagnosing the disease at the stage of dysplasia (pre-cancerous) and early cancer improves survival. This has led to the current surveillance strategy of gastroscopy with non-targeted mapping biopsies taken from the Barrett's oesophagus every two years. The large number of biopsies required is time consuming and expensive, yet dysplasia and cancerous tissue is still missed due to the non-targeted biopsy sampling strategy. Acetic acid has been used effectively in the early detection of cervical dysplasia and cancer, and has also been used with success in a high risk Barrett's population (patients with suspected dysplasia or previously treated dysplasia), but not been studied in the lower risk Barrett's surveillance population. A diagnostic study of non-targeted mapping biopsies (current practice) versus targeted biopsies (acetic acid) in a surveillance population is needed before widespread adoption of this technique is possible.

Detailed Description

This is a feasibility study to enable powering of a larger study. The investigators would assume a disease detection of 4.5% with acetic acid chromoendoscopy and 1.5% with protocol driven mapping biopsies. However, these assumptions are largely driven from a single centre cohort study and as such need clarification before they could be used for the purposes of powering a study. Based on the historical cohort studies and wide consultation within the British Society of Gastroenterology research committee and consultation with experts in the field, it is estimated that 200 patients would be reasonable for recruitment to enable the reproducibility and generalisability of this data to be established. The purpose of this study is not to produce statistically significant data in itself but to establish likely event rates and effect size to inform the power calculation for the definitive study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Aged 18 years or above
  2. Biopsy proven Barrett's metaplasia
  3. At least 2cm of Barrett's metaplasia (C0 M2)
  4. Willing and able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Less than 2cm (C0 M2) of Barrett's metaplasia
  2. Significant oesophagitis
  3. Known or prior oesophageal cancer
  4. Known or prior oesophageal dysplasia (indefinite for dysplasia CAN be included)
  5. Previous endoscopic therapy
  6. Known allergy to acetic acid
  7. Previous inclusion in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Non targeted quadrantic biopsiesNon targeted quadrantic biopsiesPatients undergo current gold standard Barrett's surveillance with quadrantic Seattle protocol biopsies
Acetic Acid targeted biopsiesAcetic AcidPatients undergo dye spray gastroscopy with Acetic Acid and targeted biopsies for areas of dysplasia.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Feasibility as assessed by the ratio of patients approached to recruited, percentage of patients who complete both endoscopies18 months

To determine the feasibility of recruiting 200 Barrett's surveillance patients in 18 months. Ratio of patients approached to recruited, percentage of patients who complete both endoscopies.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Participant acceptability of trial design18 months

To assess participant acceptability of the study design through quantitative measures related to study procedures and in-depth qualitative feedback. Qualitative feedback through semi-structured telephone interviews. Patients will be asked how acceptable they found having two endoscopies and whether they would be willing to undergo a study of similar design. This will measured by responses based on a telephone interview questionnaire.

Comparison of dysplasia rates as assessed by the number of biopsies in each endoscopy required to detect dysplasia18 months

To identify the degree of difference in dysplasia (pre-cancerous changes) detection rates between acetic acid gastroscopy (targeted biopsies) and standard gastroscopic practice (non-targeted mapping biopsies) to inform the power calculation for a definitive study. Number of biopsies in each endoscopy required to detect dysplasia.

Feasibility of training in Acetic Acid technique18 months

Feasibility of training and implementation of acetic acid guided dysplasia detection technique. Online training module with pre and post training examination. Seminar based training day with further examination thereafter and correlation of scores following the above methods. The endoscopists will be tested on a validated video library pre and post training. A further test will be performed following 3-6 months to assess for drop off in ability. Percentage of correct answers will be calculated for each test

Clinician's acceptability of using Acetic Acid technique18 months

To explore the acceptability to clinicians and patients of the concept of using a targeted biopsy technique for surveillance instead of non-targeted, mapping biopsies. Semi-structured qualitative interview to explore clinician's attitude to the use of acetic acid following training and implementation of the study. Clinician's will be asked via a telephone interview on a scale of how confident they would be to use acetic acid alone in the surveillance of Barrett's without performing non-targeted biopsies. Clinical's attitudes will be assessed pre and post training as well as at the end of the study.

Facilitators and barriers to recruitment18 months

To identify potential facilitators and barriers to recruitment and retention for the definitive trial. Qualitative patient interview for both those enrolled in the study and those who have declined to identify themes that may assist recruitment into a larger study. This will be measured by means of a telephone questionnaire.

Number of adverse events18 months

Monitoring of adverse outcomes to describe adverse events for the two methods. Number of adverse events recorded in total.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Queen Alexandra Hospital

🇬🇧

Portsmouth, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath