Evaluation of the Dimensional Alveolar Bone Changes in Immediate Post Extraction Implant Placement

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Immediate Implant With Loading
• Interventions: Procedure: immediate implant placement with or without loading

• Registration Number: NCT06515509
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensional alveolar bone changes in immediate post extraction implant placement with loading compared to immediate post extraction implant placement without loading in the maxillary premolar area . The main question it aims to answer is : Can immediate post extraction implant placement in the maxillary premolar area with loading achieve better alveolar bone dimensions than without loading?

Detailed Description

Not available

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2023-07-16
• Status Verified: 2024-07
• Primary Completion: 2024-07-16
• Study Completion: 2024-07-16
• Study First Submitted: 2024-07-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-07-17
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-07-17
• Study First Posted: 2024-07-23
• Last Update Posted: 2024-07-23

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

• 1. Patients who have at least one non restorable tooth in the maxillary premolar area that needs to be extracted.

  2. Patients with healthy systemic condition. 3. Patients aged from 20 to 45 years old. 4. Buccal bone thickness should be at least 1mm. (Morton et al., 2014) 5. Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.(Morton et al., 2014) 6. Good oral hygiene.(Wiesner et al., 2010) 7. Accepts one year follow-up period (cooperative patients) Patient provides an informed consent.

  3. Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement. 9. Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion)

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• 1. Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest. 2. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al., 2006).

3. Current and former smokers (Lambert, Morris and Ochi, 2000) 4. Pregnant females.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Immediate Implants without loading	immediate implant placement with or without loading	-
Immediate Implants with loading	immediate implant placement with or without loading	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Height of alveolar bone crest	6 months	After the implants are placed, a series of digital radiographs are obtained at 0 , 3, and 6 months duration to study the changes in the amount of crestal bone level.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Implant stability	6 months	Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured with an Osstell® (Integration Diagnostics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden)
post-surgical patient satisfaction	6 months	Post-Surgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ) composed of 3 questions is filled by the patient and numerical score is obtained
Alveolar bone width	6 months	(CBCT) images are used for evaluation of alveolar bone width around all implant sides all over. At 0. 3, 6 month postoperative by using superimposition and subtraction method

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt