Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03446326
NCT03446326RecruitingNot Applicable

Assessment of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Response to Varying Heart Rates and Body Position - a Pacemaker Based Study

University of Calgary2 sites in 1 country25 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
25
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in cardiac output while atrial pacing at lower and higher rates while supine

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators will seek to determine the effects of different heart rates on both stroke volume and cardiac output using non-invasive hemodynamic assessments. In order to safely manipulate the HR, the investigators will study patients with permanent pacemakers in whom heart rate manipulation can be done in a safe and non-invasive manner.

Detailed Description

Permanent pacemakers have sometimes been used to treat patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope. This is because patients with vasovagal syncope often experience bradycardia at the time of their syncope. Unfortunately, pacemakers are often ineffective in preventing syncope.

Classical cardiovascular hemodynamics would suggest that increasing the heart rate (HR; via pacemaker) should increase the cardiac output (CO). This is because:

CO = HR x Stroke volume (SV).

The assumption is that the SV is fixed during manipulation of the HR. However, this might not be the case. As the number of beats per minute (HR) increases, the cardiac cycle length (R-R interval [RRI]) shortens, as a function of simple math. This means that the time in cardiac systole shortens, and the time in cardiac diastole shortens. Since cardiac diastole is when the heart fills up with blood, faster HR can be associated with decreased cardiac filling times. This, in turn, could compromise the SV. However, there is a paucity of data as to what happens to SV and CO at different HR. Further, it is possible that these effects will be different when a person is lying down supine versus when a patient is upright (when stroke volume will be lower).

The investigators will seek to determine the effects of different HR on both SV & CO. In order to safely manipulate the HR, they will study patients with permanent pacemakers in whom HR manipulation can be done in a safe and non-invasive manner.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-70 years (inclusive)
  • Implanted permanent pacemaker or implanted defibrillator capable of atrial and ventricular pacing
  • LV ejection fraction >50%

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Clinical need for a cardiac resynchronization device

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in cardiac output while atrial pacing at lower and higher rates while supine

Time Frame: 1 day

Change in cardiac output (CO) when atrial pacing at 80 bpm \& 120 bpm while supine. CO = HR x Stroke volume (SV)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in cardiac output at lower and higher ventricular (VVI) paced rates while supine(1 day)
  • Change in stroke volume at lower and higher ventricular (VVI) paced rates while tilted up(1 day)
  • Change of stroke volume at lower and higher atrial (AAI) paced rates while supine versus while upright(1 day)
  • Change of stroke volume at lower and higher ventricular (VVI) paced rates while supine versus while upright(1 day)
  • Change of cardiac output at lower and higher atrial (AAI) paced rates while supine versus while upright(1 day)
  • Change of cardiac output at lower and higher ventricular (VVI) paced rates while supine versus while upright(1 day)
  • Change in stroke volume at lower and higher atrial paced rates while tilted up(1 day)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials