COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL VS INHALATIONAL SEVOFLURANE FOR LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Patients posted for day care surgeries under general anaesthesia
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/07/014944
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Deepali
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA Grade I and II patients.
2.Mallampati Grade I and II.
3.Patients scheduled for elective day care surgeries.
4.Patients who will agree to participate with written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patients with difficult airway.
2.Patients with history of esophageal re�ux or hiatus hernia.
3.Expected duration of surgery more than 2 hours.
4.Pregnant and lactating women.
5.ASA grade III and IV patients.
6.Patient refusal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease of insertion of LMATimepoint: 1.Loss of verbal contact in minutes. <br/ ><br>2.Loss of eye lash reflex in minutes. <br/ ><br>3.To achieve adequate jaw relaxation in minutes. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Haemodynamic variables <br/ ><br>Insertion AttemptsTimepoint: Effective airway establishment time (mins)