Comparison of two drugs for assessing the easier insertion conditions of a airway device to give General Anaesthesia
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/12/022209
- Lead Sponsor
- PIMS Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 85
Patients admitted to our hospital posted for short surgical procedures coming under American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II.
Mallampati Grade I & II
Surgeries lasting for 1 to 2 hours (like short gynaecologic procedures, Incision and drainage and fibroadenoma excision)
Emergency surgeries
Patients at the risk of aspiration (hiatus hernia, pregnancy, full stomach, intestinal ileus) Patients with known gastrointestinal reflux, sore throat, upper respiratory airway infections.
Patients suffering from pharyngeal pathology e.g. abscess, haematoma and tissue disruption.
Low pulmonary compliance e.g. morbid obesity, bronchospasm or pulmonary oedema.
Patients undergoing oral surgery and those allergic to propofol, Dexmedetomidine or Butorphanol.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare Butorphanol and Dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to propofol on the insertion conditions of Baska Mask for short proceduresTimepoint: 2 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.The ease of insertion (assessed by the duration of time taken to insert them successfully and the number of insertion attempts)Timepoint: 1 hour <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>;2.To assess the incidence of complications such as laryngospasm during insertionTimepoint: 2 hours;3.To detect the hemodynamic responses induced by airway insertion (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2)Timepoint: 2 hours