IRCT2016062914333N53
Completed
Phase 2
Comparative Study of pain rate in buccal infiltration with Mepivacaine and Articaine with epinephrine injection in upper premolars region in patients that refer to the surgical department of dental school
Vice Chancellor for Research Affairs, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences , Kermanshah Univers0 sites30 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- ?Acute pain.
- Sponsor
- Vice Chancellor for Research Affairs, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences , Kermanshah Univers
- Enrollment
- 30
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •lack of sensitivity to inject; lack of sensitivity to Mepivacaine and Articaine; No pregnancy for women
- •Exclusion criteria: Unbearable pain
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 4
Comparing Two different agents of Local anesthesiaHealth Condition 1: 3- AdministrationCTRI/2024/01/061711Dr Rohan Jiteshkumar Doshi182
Unknown
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar TechniqueLocal Anesthetic ComplicationNCT04812639Cairo University22
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purposeCTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Buccal Infiltration of Different Volumes of Articaine for Extraction.Buccal InfiltrationArticaineAnesthesiaNCT06630819Qassim University114
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of two techniques of anesthesia in upper first molars using 4% articaine in irreversible pulpitisHealth Condition 1: null- Irreversible PulpitisCTRI/2016/09/007286Dr Anuprabha Shrivastava100