To compare effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula as a method for weaning compared to conventional weaning in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care unit
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/06/043187
- Lead Sponsor
- King George medical college
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All mechanically ventilated patients, aged 18 years to 65 years, who are ventilated for more than 48 hours and their underlying pathology has either resolved or improving and they meet the weaning criteria
Exclusion Criteria
A) cardiac arrest,acute coronary syndrome or life threatening arrhythmia
B)failure of more than 2 organs
C) recent trauma or burns of neck and face
D) contraindications of high flow nasal cannula ( abnormalities of face , nose, airway or pneumothorax, recent cranial surgery, severe bulbous lung disease)
E) unplanned or self extubation
F)APACHE score more than 25
G) once failed weaning trial
H) tracheostomised patient
I) neuromuscular disorder
J) non cooperation
K) pregnancy
L) refusal of treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method