Comparison of decay removal using four different methods.
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/07/034545
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Prerana Kothari S
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1)Class 1 dentinal caries with broad occlusal cavitated lesion on permanent molars.
2)Radiographically carious lesion has to be confined to outer dentin of occlusal surface.
3)Patient aged between 18-40 years old.
4)Teeth with intact buccal/lingual surface.
5)RDT >= 1.5 mm
Exclusion Criteria
1)Permanent molars with clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of pulpal and periapical lesions.
2)Teeth with any developmental anomaly.
3)Teeth with proximal caries and pulpal involvement.
4)Teeth with previous restoration and fractured crown.
5)Presence of white spot lesions.
6)Hypoplastic or hypomineralized teeth.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the caries removal efficacy in terms of microbiological assessment and efficiency in terms of time taken by Tungsten Carbide No 330 bur,Polymer bur,Brix 3000 gel,Er:Cr:YSGG laserTimepoint: Patient recalled for the follow up appointments at 3,6 and 12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Good oral hygiene is achieved.Timepoint: Patient recalled for the follow up appointments at 3,6 and 12 months