Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02161692
NCT02161692
Completed
Phase 2

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Conventional Dose Chemotherapy Versus High Dose Sequential Chemotherapy as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano1 site in 1 countryDecember 1996

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Bleomycin
Conditions
Testicular Neoplasms
Sponsor
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Evidence of disease progression confirmed by computed tomography (CT) scan and/or serum tumor markers.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a sequential high dose chemotherapy is more effective than conventional dose (i.e. 4 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin [PEB]) in patients with metastatic poor prognosis germ cell tumors.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 1996
End Date
April 2009
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Sponsor
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Andrea Necchi

Faculty, Department of Medical Oncology

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical or Histological diagnosis of germ cell tumors
  • Metastatic disease
  • Poor prognostic category according to the International Germ Cell Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification
  • No prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unwillingness to accomplish the study procedures
  • Any existing co-morbidity that could limit the administration of high dose chemotherapy
  • Any psychiatric disorder that could impact on the study compliance

Arms & Interventions

Conventional dose chemotherapy

Cisplatin, Etoposide, and Bleomycin (PEB) x 4 cycles

Intervention: Bleomycin

High dose chemotherapy

Characterized by the following sequence: High dose cyclophosphamide (7 grams/squared meter) x 1 cycle 2 cycles of high-dose etoposide and cisplatin 1 cycle of high dose carboplatin (Area Under the Curve 27) with stem cell rescue

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

High dose chemotherapy

Characterized by the following sequence: High dose cyclophosphamide (7 grams/squared meter) x 1 cycle 2 cycles of high-dose etoposide and cisplatin 1 cycle of high dose carboplatin (Area Under the Curve 27) with stem cell rescue

Intervention: Etoposide

High dose chemotherapy

Characterized by the following sequence: High dose cyclophosphamide (7 grams/squared meter) x 1 cycle 2 cycles of high-dose etoposide and cisplatin 1 cycle of high dose carboplatin (Area Under the Curve 27) with stem cell rescue

Intervention: Cisplatin

High dose chemotherapy

Characterized by the following sequence: High dose cyclophosphamide (7 grams/squared meter) x 1 cycle 2 cycles of high-dose etoposide and cisplatin 1 cycle of high dose carboplatin (Area Under the Curve 27) with stem cell rescue

Intervention: Carboplatin

Conventional dose chemotherapy

Cisplatin, Etoposide, and Bleomycin (PEB) x 4 cycles

Intervention: Etoposide

Conventional dose chemotherapy

Cisplatin, Etoposide, and Bleomycin (PEB) x 4 cycles

Intervention: Cisplatin

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evidence of disease progression confirmed by computed tomography (CT) scan and/or serum tumor markers.

Time Frame: 5 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Overall survival(5 years)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials