Genotype-guided treatment of children with uncontrolled asthma
- Conditions
- Children with persistent uncontrolled asthmaTherapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Therapeutic techniques [E02]
- Registration Number
- EUCTR2017-004424-29-NL
- Lead Sponsor
- Academic Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Authorised-recruitment may be ongoing or finished
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Between 6-18 years of age
- Doctor's diagnosis of asthma (ever) based on patient history, FEV1 reversibility >= 12% ever and/or bronchial
hyperresponsiveness ever.
- Current asthma symptoms (based on ACT (>= 12 years) or c-ACT (< 12 years) score <= 19
ICS use >= 3 months before inclusion (start dosage ICS treatment step 2 according to childhood asthma guideline (NVK))
- adequate inhalation technique
- self-assessed good adherence to maintenance asthma treatment
- understanding of Dutch Language
- internet access at home, willing to fill in questionnaires
Are the trial subjects under 18? yes
Number of subjects for this age range: 310
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
- active smoking
- congenital heart disease
- serious lung disease other than asthma
- LABA use in the past 6 months
- omalizumab use
- ICU admission in the previous year
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Main Objective: To assess whether ADRB2-genotype guided asthma treatment in children with persistent asthma symptoms despite ICS treatment leads to better asthma control compared to non-genotype guided asthma treatment;Secondary Objective: Not applicable;Primary end point(s): Asthma control according to the Asthma Control Test (ACT) or childhood-Asthma Control Test (c-ACT);Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br> Secondary end point(s): RNA expression<br> Microbiome<br> Lung Function<br> FeNO<br> cost-effectiveness<br> ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 6 months