MedPath

Effect of Using Endotracheal Tube Introducer for Intubation During Mechanical Chest Compressions in a Manikin

Not Applicable
Conditions
Intubation, Intratracheal
Advanced Cardiac Life Support
Interventions
Device: Macintosh laryngoscope
Device: Endotracheal tube introducer
Registration Number
NCT04116333
Lead Sponsor
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of using ETI with the Macintosh laryngoscope on first pass success rates of the final year students of medical school on a manikin during continuous chest compressions with mechanical compression device.

Detailed Description

Fifty-two final year students of Kocaeli University Medical School will participate to the study. The participants will complete the one-hour training lecture on the use of the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML) and the endotracheal tube introducer (ETI) that will be instructed by an emergency medicine specialist. The information section will be followed by a chance of practice each endotracheal intubation method once by using the ML with and without the ETI on the manikin.

Mechanical compression device will be used to perform chest compressions. The manikin will be placed on an ambulance stretcher in a supine position. Airway interventions will be performed in a sitting position on a seat that will be adjusted to the same height with the ambulance seat. The airway kit will be placed beside the head of the manikin.

Each participant will perform 2 airway interventions. Participants will be allowed for maximum 2 attempts for each method. Each procedure will be recorded to the video camera. The participants will be aware of the video camera. Following the interventions each participant will be asked to grade the difficulty of the both methods on a 5-point Likert scale defined as 1: very easy, 2: easy, 3: moderate, 4: difficult and 5: very difficult. The participants will be asked for whether they have prior clinical experience or not with ML or/and ML with ETI use.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participants who want to participate the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participants who do not want to participate the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MLMacintosh laryngoscopeIntubation with using the Macintosh laryngoscope on a manikin during continuous chest compressions with mechanical compression device.
ML + ETIEndotracheal tube introducerIntubation with using endotracheal tube introducer with the Macintosh laryngoscope on a manikin during continuous chest compressions with mechanical compression device.
ML + ETIMacintosh laryngoscopeIntubation with using endotracheal tube introducer with the Macintosh laryngoscope on a manikin during continuous chest compressions with mechanical compression device.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First pass success1 minute

Comparison of the first pass success of the Macintosh laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope with endotracheal tube introducer groups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difficulty level of each method according to the Likert scale1 minute

Grading the difficulty of the Macintosh laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope with endotracheal tube introducer on a 5-point Likert scale

Time to endotracheal intubation1 minute

The mean time to successful endotracheal intubation of Macintosh laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope with endotracheal tube introducer groups

Second endotracheal intubation attempt success rates1 minute

Second endotracheal intubation attempt success rates of Macintosh laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope with endotracheal tube introducer groups

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath