NCT00874016已完成不适用
A Comparison of the Airtraq and Standard Direct Laryngoscopy in the Pediatric Airway - A Randomized Trial.
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Time to intubation
研究概览
简要总结
Time to intubate, view to glottic opening and success rate are not different when Airtraq technique is used compared to standard direct laryngoscopy in children.
详细描述
50 children (age 5 years and 11 month or younger) with expected easy intubation, scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation are enrolled.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- — 至 6 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation
排除标准
- •predicted difficult bag-mask ventilation
- •predicted difficult intubation
- •rapid sequence induction
- •emergency endotracheal intubation
- •hemodynamic instability
- •emergency surgery
- •non-english speaking caregivers/parents
结局指标
主要结局
Time to intubation
时间窗: 1 day
次要结局
- Percentage of glottic opening seen(1 day)
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
Comparison of Airtraq Versus MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal ApproachTracheal IntubationNCT00847184Kliniken Essen-Mitte200
尚未招募
2 期
TO COMPARE BETWEEN THREE INSTRUMENTS USED TO VISUALIZE VOCAL CORDSCTRI/2021/09/036334KIMS
已完成
不适用
Comparison between Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation required for general anaesthesiaCTRI/2018/05/013760Seth G s medical college and KEM hospital70
尚未招募
不适用
ââ?¬Å? A clinical comparison of intubation characteristics in standard sniffing position versus head elevation beyond sniffing position for intubation in adults - an observational study ââ?¬Å?CTRI/2022/10/046391Government of Gujarat
已完成
不适用
A Comparison of Two GlideScope Intubation TechniquesIntubation, EndotrachealAnesthesia, GeneralNCT01865643Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital81