The role of sensory signals on satiety and food preferences.

Recruiting

• Conditions: Eating Behaviour

• Registration Number: NL-OMON22093
• Lead Sponsor: Wageningen University, Department of Human Nutrition

Brief Summary

/A

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 28 February 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: 18-35 years;

2. BMI: 18.5 – 25.0 kg/m2;

Exclusion Criteria

1. Restraint eating (men: score > 2.25; women: score > 2.80);

2. Lack of appetite;

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Our main outcome measurement is the difference in energy intake (kJ) during an ad libitum test meal after 24h of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1. To assess the effect of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on subjective ratings of appetite using a VAS;<br /><br>2. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on different aspects of food reward (explicit liking, explicit wanting, implicit wanting, relative food choice) of 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using the computerized Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ);<br /><br>3. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on cognitive associations of towards 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using a Sorting Paired Features (SPF) task.