The role of sensory signals on satiety and food preferences.
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Eating Behaviour
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON22093
- Lead Sponsor
- Wageningen University, Department of Human Nutrition
- Brief Summary
/A
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age: 18-35 years;
2. BMI: 18.5 – 25.0 kg/m2;
Exclusion Criteria
1. Restraint eating (men: score > 2.25; women: score > 2.80);
2. Lack of appetite;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Our main outcome measurement is the difference in energy intake (kJ) during an ad libitum test meal after 24h of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To assess the effect of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on subjective ratings of appetite using a VAS;<br /><br>2. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on different aspects of food reward (explicit liking, explicit wanting, implicit wanting, relative food choice) of 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using the computerized Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ);<br /><br>3. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on cognitive associations of towards 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using a Sorting Paired Features (SPF) task.