MedPath

Manual Ventilation Versus Pressure Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Children

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Ventilation
Registration Number
NCT02751047
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

The investigator will compare the feasibility of manual ventilation and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation during facemask ventilation in children. The hypothesis is that the incidence of gastric insufflation would be lower during pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation when compared to manual ventilation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
154
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1, 2
  • Children with normal body mass index
Exclusion Criteria
  • Difficult airway management
  • pulmonary disease
  • upper respiratory infection
  • risk of pulmonary aspiration
  • intestinal obstruction or abdominal distension
  • stroke history or moyamoya disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of gastric insufflationDuring facemask ventilation (90 seconds)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The number of patients with adequate tidal volumeDuring facemask ventilation (90 seconds)

Tidal volume of 6 - 10 ml/kg

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Seoul National University Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.