MedPath

Comparison of Volume Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Controlled Ventilation in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bariatric Surgery
Registration Number
NCT03758937
Lead Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare volume controlled-ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in terms of pulmonary gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Detailed Description

Today, morbid obesity has become a global problem. It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode will be used in bariatric surgery, which is one of the treatment options of these patients. VCV is the most commonly used mode to ventilate anesthetized patients. However, especially in obese patients, high airway pressures and hypoxia may occur due to increased intrapulmonary shunts. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the potential of PCV strategy to improve pulmonary gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values according to VCV in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
62
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years or above,
  • ASA II patients
  • BMI > 40 kg / m2
  • No serious comorbidity.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unstable patients during the operation
  • The requirement for mechanical ventilation in the postoperative period.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Partial oxygen pressurethrough surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using arterial blood gas

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peak airway pressure5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using the patient monitor.

Dynamic compliance5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using formula (Tidal volume/peak airway pressure - Positive end-expiratory pressure)

Inspired oxygen pressure / Fractional oxygen ratio5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient pressure5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using formula (D(A-a) O2).

Partial carbon dioxide pressure5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using arterial blood gas analysis.

Partial carbon dioxide pressure - end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes

Assessed 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and through surgery completion, an average of 90 minutes by using arterial blood gas analysis and end-tidal monitor.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Antalya Traning and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Antalya, Turkey

Antalya Traning and Research Hospital
🇹🇷Antalya, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.